AWA

Banner image with text: 'Stay informed with the latest IP news' and the following words listed: Insights, Interviews, Webinars.

Can innovative clean tech companies save the world…and still be profitable?

By AWA | Posted on September 10, 2015

Well, as we all know, innovation and research and development usually cost a lot of money, and the simplest incentive for innovations is often to earn more, or alternatively to save, money. Facing the threat of global warming, i.e. climate change, many new ideas have developed to make us less dependent on fossil fuels, to...

Tags: Clean tech, global warming, IPR, Patent

New hope for trademark owners in China

By AWA | Posted on September 3, 2015

In China, the trademark system is based on the “first-to-file” system, which means that the first company or person to file owns the legal right to the trademark. There is no requirement for the intention to actually use the mark as we know it from a.o. the US system. Up until now the so called...

Tags: china, Chinese Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, Michael Bastian, TRAB, Trademark, Trademark Squatters

Will there be any difference in the oral hearings between the EPO and the UPC?

By AWA | Posted on May 13, 2015

Anyone who has been attending an oral proceeding at the EPO, either as an observer or as an active party knows what it’s like. You need to think fast and stay on your toes, and watch your language because every issue, often starting with added subject matter, is taken to a decision immediately. The proceedings...

Tags: EPO, oral hearings, unified patent court, unitary patent, UPC

Is there anything morally wrong with “Je suis Charlie”?

By AWA | Posted on January 21, 2015

In continuation of the terrible terror attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, social medias were flooded with the phrase “Je suis Charlie” (“I am Charlie”) as a message of condolence, outrage and defiance, as well as support for the right to free expression. As expected, this social media wave resulted in a vast...

Tags: OHIM, trademarks

Revisions to Canadian Trademark Act

By AWA | Posted on November 6, 2014

Earlier this year Canada’s government proposed Canada major changes to the Canadian Trademark Act and in June the bill (C-31) received royal assent. The changes enable Canada, as one of the last (if not the last) western industrialized countries, to accede to the Madrid Protocol, Nice Agreement and the Singapore Treaty. Some of the most...

Tags: Canada, Madrid Protocol, Nice Agreement, Singapore Treaty, trademarks

Swedish supreme court: Trademark infringement is not a crime for which “the nature of the crime” motivates imprisonment

By AWA | Posted on October 24, 2014

It is rather well-known that a trademark infringement may result in claims for damages. On the other hand, the awareness is probably not as high about the risk for an individual to end up in jail for the very same violation. The extent to which the latter should happen was the question to be decided...

Tags: Supreme Court, sweden, trademark infringement

Copyright in relation to e-books

By AWA | Posted on September 26, 2014

The copyright protection of authors is being increasingly challenged by the continuing digitalization of the book market. The emergence of the e-book has caused a very IP-relevant question: Is the consumer allowed to re-sell the e-book he purchased? When it comes to physical works such as hard copy books, European copyright legislation clearly states that...

Tags: copyright, e-books

Revisions to the Korean Trademark Act

By AWA | Posted on September 19, 2014

The aim of the revisions, which were implemented in June this year, is to reinforce the position of trademark owners, which the following examples will indicate. The article handling the protection of well known trademarks has become clearer. Now it is clearly stated in the Trademark Act that applications for trademarks which are likely to...

Tags: Japan, Korea, trademarks

Danish law can be applicable to infringing sales from UK websites

By AWA | Posted on July 8, 2014

The Danish Maritime and Commercial Court has recently rendered a decision in a case regarding sale of infringing furniture designs from two British websites. The decision is interesting for practitioners as it explains which exact elements are added substantial weight, when defining which law is applicable to an online infringement. When deciding whether sale of...

Tags: Denmark, design protection, UK

Recent contributors

Alexandre Theodorou, Partner and European Patent Attorney, Brussels, Belgium

Alexandre Theodorou

Partner, European Patent Attorney

Laura Stravinskaite, Senior Associate and Attorney at Law, Copenhagen K, Denmark

Laura Stravinskaite

Senior Associate, Attorney at Law

Ai-Leen Lim, Partner and Attorney at Law, Hong Kong SAR

Ai-Leen Lim

Partner, Attorney at Law, Group Vice President

Ashley Zhao, Partner and Attorney at Law, Beijing, China

Ashley Zhao

Partner, Attorney at Law, Business Area Manager

Troels Peter Rørdam, Senior Counsel and European Patent Attorney, Copenhagen K, Denmark

Troels Peter Rørdam

Senior Counsel, European Patent Attorney